Resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Ireland 2012-2020: Modelling national temporal developments and survival predictors.

Aim: To explore potential predictors of national out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival, including health system developments and the COVID pandemic in Ireland. Methods: National level OHCA registry data from 2012 through to 2020, relating to unwitnessed, and bystander witnessed OHCA were interrogated. Logistic regression models were built by including predictors through stepwise variable selection and enhancing the models by adding pairwise interactions that improved fit. Missing data sensitivity analyses were conducted using multiple imputation. Results: The data included 18,177 cases. The final model included seventeen variables. Of these nine variables were involved in pairwise interactions. The COVID-19 period was associated with reduced survival (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.43, 0.87), as were increasing age in years (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.96, 0.97) and call response interval in minutes (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.99). Amiodarone administration (OR 3.91, 95% CI 2.80, 5.48), urban location (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12, 1.77), and chronological year over time (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08, 1.20) were associated with increased survival. Conclusions: National survival from OHCA has significantly increased incrementally over time in Ireland. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased survival even after accounting for potential disruption to key elements of bystander and EMS care. Further research is needed to understand and address the discrepancy between urban and rural OHCA survival. Information concerning pre-event patient health status and inpatient care process may yield important additional insights in future.

Temporal trends of ambulance time intervals for suspected stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland: a quasi-experimental study.

OBJECTIVES: Time is a fundamental component of acute stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) care, thus minimising prehospital delays is a crucial part of the stroke chain of survival. COVID-19 restrictions were introduced in Ireland in response to the pandemic, which resulted in major societal changes. However, current research on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on prehospital care for stroke/TIA is limited to early COVID-19 waves. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on ambulance time intervals and suspected stroke/TIA call volume for adults with suspected stroke and TIA in Ireland, from 2018 to 2021. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary data analysis with a quasi-experimental design. SETTING: We used data from the National Ambulance Service in Ireland. We defined the COVID-19 period as '1 March 2020-31 December 2021' and the pre-COVID-19 period '1 January 2018-29 February 2020'. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared five ambulance time intervals: 'allocation performance', 'mobilisation performance', 'response time', 'on scene time' and 'conveyance time' between the two periods using descriptive and regression analyses. We also compared call volume for suspected stroke/TIA between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods using interrupted time series analysis. PARTICIPANTS: We included all suspected stroke/TIA cases ≥18 years who called the National Ambulance Service from 2018 to 2021. RESULTS: 40 004 cases were included: 19 826 in the pre-COVID-19 period and 19 731 in the COVID-19 period. All ambulance time intervals increased during the pandemic period compared with pre-COVID-19 (p<0.001). Call volume increased during the COVID-19-period compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A 'shock' like a pandemic has a negative impact on the prehospital phase of care for time-sensitive conditions like stroke/TIA. System evaluation and public awareness campaigns are required to ensure maintenance of prehospital stroke pathways amidst future healthcare crises. Thus, this research is relevant to routine and extraordinary prehospital service planning.

Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. METHODS: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August-September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. RESULTS: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2-4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. CONCLUSIONS: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.

New care pathway to enable ambulances transfer patients to a model 2 hospital medical assessment unit.

BACKGROUND: Reconfiguration of the Irish acute hospital sector resulted in the establishment of a Medical Assessment Unit (MAU) in Mallow General Hospital (MGH). We developed a protocol whereby certain patients deemed to be low risk for clinical deterioration could be brought by the National Ambulance Service (NAS) to the MAU following a 999 or 112 call. AIMS: The aim of this paper is to report on the initial experience of this quality improvement initiative. METHODS: The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle for quality improvement was implemented when undertaking this project. A pathway was established whereby, following discussion between paramedic and physician, patients for whom a 999 or 112 call had been made could be brought directly to the MAU in MGH. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed. The protocol was implemented from the 1st of September 2022 for a 3-month pilot period. RESULTS: Of 39 patients discussed, 29 were accepted for review in the MAU. One of the 29 accepted patients declined transfer to MAU. Of 28 patients reviewed in the MAU, 7 were discharged home. One patient required same day transfer to a model 4 centre. Twenty patients were admitted to MGH with an average length of stay of 8 days. Frailty and falls accounted for 7 of the admissions and the mean length of stay for these patients was 12 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have demonstrated the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of this pathway. With increased resourcing, upscaling of this initiative is possible and should be considered.

Tools and methods for evaluating the change to health service delivery due to pandemics or other similar emergencies: A rapid evidence review.

The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease COVID-19, were declared a pandemic in March 2020. Countries developed rapid response activities within their health services to prevent spread of the virus and protect their populations. Evaluating health service delivery change is vital to assess how adapted practices worked, particularly during times of crisis. This review examined tools and methods that are used to evaluate health service delivery change during pandemics and similar emergencies. Five databases were searched, including PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The SPIDER tool informed the inclusion criteria for the articles. Articles in English and published from 2002 to 2020 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the studies. Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria. Many evaluation tools, methods, and frameworks were identified in the literature. Only one established tool was specific to a particular disease outbreak. Others, including rapid-cycle improvement and PDSA cycles were implemented across various disease outbreaks. Novel evaluation strategies were common across the literature and included checklists, QI frameworks, questionnaires, and surveys. Adherence practices, experience with telehealth, patient/healthcare staff safety, and clinical competencies were some areas evaluated by the tools and methods. Several domains, including patient/practitioner safety and patient/practitioner experience with telemedicine were also identified in the studies.

Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Ireland 2012-2020: Protocol for an observational study.

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of preventable mortality that now affects almost 3,000 people each year in Ireland. Survival is low at 6-7%, compared to a European average of 8%. The Irish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Registry (OHCAR) prospectively gathers data on all OHCA in Ireland where emergency medical services attempted resuscitation.The Irish health system has undergone several developments that are relevant to OHCA care in the period 2012-2020. OHCAR data provides a means of exploring temporal trends in OHCA incidence, care, and outcomes over time. It also provides a means of exploring whether system developments were associated with a change in key outcomes.This research aims to summarise key trends in available OHCAR data from the period 2012 - 2020, to explore and model predictors of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and survival, and to explore the hypothesis that significant system level temporal developments were associated with improvements in these outcomes. Methods: The following protocol sets out the relevant background and research approach for an observational study that will address the above aims. Key trends in available OHCAR data (2012 - 2020) will be described and evaluated using descriptive summaries and graphical displays. Multivariable logistic regression will be used to model predictors of 'bystander CPR', 'bystander defibrillation' and 'survival to hospital discharge' and to explore the effects (if any) of system level developments in 2015/2016 and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) on these outcomes. Discussion: The findings of this research will be used to understand temporal trends in the care processes and outcomes for OHCA in Ireland over the period 2012-2020. The results can further be used to optimise future health system developments for OHCA in both Ireland and internationally.

Clinician consensus on "Inappropriate" presentations to the Emergency Department in the Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) census: a cross-sectional multi-centre study of emergency department utilisation in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Utilisation of the Emergency Department (ED) for non-urgent care increases demand for services, therefore reducing inappropriate or avoidable attendances is an important area for intervention in prevention of ED crowding. This study aims to develop a consensus between clinicians across care settings about the "appropriateness" of attendances to the ED in Ireland. METHODS: The Better Data, Better Planning study was a multi-centre, cross-sectional study investigating factors influencing ED utilisation in Ireland. Data was compiled in patient summary files which were assessed for measures of appropriateness by an academic General Practitioner (GP) and academic Emergency Medicine Consultant (EMC) National Panel. In cases where consensus was not reached charts were assessed by an Independent Review Panel (IRP). At each site all files were autonomously assessed by local GP-EMC panels. RESULTS: The National Panel determined that 11% (GP) to 38% (EMC) of n = 306 lower acuity presentations could be treated by a GP within 24-48 h (k = 0.259; p < 0.001) and that 18% (GP) to 35% (EMC) of attendances could be considered "inappropriate" (k = 0.341; p < 0.001). For attendances deemed "appropriate" the admission rate was 47% compared to 0% for "inappropriate" attendees. There was no consensus on 45% of charts (n = 136). Subset analysis by the IRP determined that consensus for appropriate attendances ranged from 0 to 59% and for inappropriate attendances ranged from 0 to 29%. For the Local Panel review (n = 306) consensus on appropriateness ranged from 40 to 76% across ED sites. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary clinicians agree that "inappropriate" use of the ED in Ireland is an issue. However, obtaining consensus on appropriateness of attendance is challenging and there was a significant cohort of complex heterogenous presentations where agreement could not be reached by clinicians in this study. This research again demonstrates the complexity of ED crowding, the introduction of evidence-based care pathways targeting avoidable presentations may serve to alleviate the problem in our EDs.

The Development of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in the Republic of Ireland.

Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) have formed an integral component of the Irish health care system for the past decade; yet, the factors leading their commencement, their evolutions over this time, and the current model of service delivery have not been widely published. Aeromedical service provision may vary significantly from country to country and may also vary regionally within countries. A health system's necessities; capacity and maturity; the level of state, corporate, private, or community investment; and the capacity of the contracted service provider are all factors that influence the service provision. This research article describes the historic factors leading to a military and health system collaboration to HEMS during an era of health care reform. Over the past decade, the Irish health system has undergone significant reconfiguration and centralization of services, leading to increased demands on emergency medical ground and air medical services. Future advancements in aeromedical service provision require an innate understanding of the current model. This article adds to the knowledge base, informs policy makers, and supports decision making surrounding HEMS provision and the potential to explore military and health system collaborations and enhanced overall service provision.

Attitudes and knowledge of emergency doctors towards end-of-life care in the emergency department: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are seeing an increase in patients requiring end-of-life (EOL) care. There is paucity of data of attitudes and knowledge of physicians providing EOL care in the ED both internationally and in Ireland. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to assess the attitudes and knowledge of ED physicians towards EOL care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional electronic survey of ED physicians working in Irish EDs and was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network over a 6-week period. The questionnaire covered the following domains: demographic data, awareness of EOL Care, views and attitudes towards EOL care. RESULTS: Of a potential 679 respondents, 441 responses were received, of which 311 (response rate of 44.8%) had fully completed the survey across 23 participant sites. Majority of the respondents were under the age of 35 (62%), were male (58%) and at Senior House Officer level (36%). In terms of awareness, 32% (98) of respondents were not aware of palliative care services in their hospitals while only 29% (91) were aware of national EOL guidance. Fifty-five percent (172) reported commencing EOL care in the ED, however 75.5% (234) respondents reported their knowledge of EOL care to be limited or non-existent. Only 30.2% respondents felt comfortable commencing EOL care in the ED without speciality team input. There appears to be a lack of clarity on the roles and responsibilities of emergency medicine nurses and doctors in the care of the dying patient in ED with only 31.2% (95) being clear on this role. Significant differences were observed associated with clinical experience and physician grade. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted a lack of awareness and knowledge of EOL care particularly amongst less experienced emergency medicine doctors. Formalized training and education programs in the provision of EOL care in the ED will improve comfort levels and knowledge amongst the emergency medicine doctors and improve the quality of care provided.

A retrospective review of patients who sustained traumatic brain injury in Ireland 2014-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most significant cause of death and disability resulting from major trauma. The aim of this study is to describe the demographics of TBI patients, the current pathways of care and outcomes in the Republic of Ireland from 2014 to 2019. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all TBI patients meeting inclusion criteria in Ireland's Major Trauma Audit (MTA) from 2014 to 2019. Severe TBI was defined as an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥3 and GCS ≤8. RESULTS: During the study period, 30,891 patients sustained major trauma meeting inclusion criteria for MTA, of which 7,393 (23.9%) patients met the inclusion criteria for TBI; 1,025 (13.9%) were classified as severe. The median age was 60.6 years (IQR 36.9-78.0), 54.3 years (32.8-73.4) for males and 71.7 years (50.0-83.0) for females (p<0.001). Of patients with severe TBI, 185 (18.0%) were brought direct to a neurosurgical centre, 389 (37.9%) were transferred to a neurosurgical centre and 321 (31.3%) had a neurosurgical intervention performed. In patients sustaining severe TBI, older patients (Adjusted OR, 0.96,95% CI 0.95-0.97) and patients requiring another surgery (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.18-0.53) were less likely to be secondarily transferred to a neurosurgical centre. There were 47 (4.6%) patients with severe TBI discharged to rehabilitation. The 30-day mortality in Ireland was 11.6% in all TBI patients and 45.5% in severe TBI patients. Older patients and patients with higher ISS had a higher chance of death. Male patients, patients treated in neurosurgical centre, patients who had neurosurgery or non-neurosurgical surgery had a higher chance of survival. CONCLUSION: This population-based study bench marks the 'as is' for patients with TBI in Ireland. We found that presently in Ireland, the mortality rate from severe TBI appears to be higher than that reported in international literature, and only a minority of severe TBI patients are brought directly from the incident to a neurosurgical centre. The new major trauma system should focus on providing effective and efficient access to neurosurgical, neuro-critical and neuro-rehabilitative care for patients who sustain TBI.

National Emergency Resuscitation Airway Audit (NERAA): a pilot multicentre analysis of emergency intubations in Irish emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of literature on why and how patients are intubated, and by whom, in Irish Emergency Departments (EDs). The aim of this pilot study was to characterise emergency airway management (EAM) of critically unwell patients presenting to Irish EDs. METHODS: A multisite prospective pilot study was undertaken from February 10 to May 10, 2020. This project was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN). All patients over 16 years of age requiring EAM were included. Eleven EDs participated in the project. Data recorded included patients' demographics, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubating clinician, number of attempts, success/complications rates and variation across centres. RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, 118 patients underwent 131 intubation attempts across 11 EDs. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 40-70). Medical indications were reported in 83% of patients compared to 17% for trauma. Of the 118 patients intubated, Emergency Medicine (EM) doctors performed 54% of initial intubations, while anaesthesiology/intensive care medicine (ICM) doctors performed 46%. The majority (90%) of intubating clinicians were at registrar level. Emergency intubation check lists, video laryngoscopy and bougie were used in 55, 53 and 64% of first attempts, respectively. The first pass success rate was 89%. Intubation complications occurred in 19% of patients. EM doctors undertook a greater proportion of intubations in EDs with > 50,000 attendance (65%) compared to EDs with < 50,000 attendances (16%) (p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe EAM in Irish EDs, and demonstrates comparable first pass success and complication rates to international studies. This study highlights the need for continuous EAM surveillance and could provide a vector for developing national standards for EAM and EAM training in Irish EDs.

Implementing delirium screening in the emergency department: a quality improvement project.

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a serious medical condition that is common in older adults in acute settings. Clinical practice guidelines recommend that all older patients in acute care settings should be screened for delirium using standardised outcome measures. PROBLEM: In our institution, an audit showed that only 16% of older adults presenting to the emergency department were screened for delirium. The goal of this project was to increase the number of patients being screened for delirium using Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology and tools and a multidisciplinary approach. METHOD: A multidisciplinary team in the emergency department used LSS tools and methodology over a 12-week period to first identify why patients were not being screened for delirium using root cause analysis and second to implement a multifaceted intervention including education, audits and feedback, documentation changes and team huddles. An audit was performed at the 11th week of the project to measure how many patients were being screened for delirium post project intervention. RESULTS: Results at 5 weeks post intervention (11th week of project) showed that the percentage of patients being screened for delirium had increased from 16% to 82%. A follow-up audit at 17 weeks post intervention showed a further improvement in delirium screening to 92%. CONCLUSION: Applying LSS tools and methodology resulted in a healthcare quality improvement. Delirium screening in an emergency department can be improved through multifaceted interventions including education, documentation changes and team huddle changes.

Community first response and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Identifying priorities for data collection, analysis, and use via the nominal group technique.

AIM: Community First Response (CFR) is an important component of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest management in many countries, including Ireland. Reliable, strategic data collection and analysis are required to support the development of CFR. However, data on CFR are currently limited in Ireland and internationally. This research aimed to identify the most important CFR data to record, the most important uses of CFR data, and barriers and facilitators to CFR data collection and use. METHODS: The Nominal Group Technique structured consensus process was used. An expert panel comprising key stakeholders, including volunteers, clinicians, researchers, policy-makers, and a patient, completed a survey to generate lists of the most important CFR data to record and the most important uses of CFR data. Subsequently, they participated in a consensus meeting to agree the top ten priorities from each list. They also identified barriers and facilitators to CFR data collection and use. RESULTS: The top ten CFR data items to record included volunteer response time, interventions/activities completed by volunteers, and the mental/physical impact on volunteers. The top ten most important uses of CFR data included providing feedback to volunteers, improving volunteer training, and measuring CFR effectiveness. Barriers included time constraints and limited training. Facilitators included having appropriate software/equipment and collecting minimal data. CONCLUSION: The results can guide CFR research and inform the development of CFR data collection and analysis policy and practice in Ireland and internationally. Ultimately, improving CFR data collection and use will help to optimise this important intervention and enhance its evidence base.

Quality improvement in a crisis: a qualitative study of experiences and lessons learned from the Irish National Ambulance Service response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has produced radical changes in international health services. In Ireland, the National Ambulance Service established a novel home and community testing service that was central to the national COVID-19 screening programme. This service was overseen by a multidisciplinary response room. This research examined the response room service, particularly areas that performed well and areas requiring improvement, using a quality improvement (QI) framework. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study comprising semi-structured, individual interviews. Maximum variation sampling was used. The data were analysed using an established thematic analysis procedure. The analysis was guided by the framework, which comprised six QI drivers. SETTING: Response room employees, including clinicians, dispatchers and administrators, were interviewed via telephone. RESULTS: Leadership for quality: participants valued person-oriented leadership, including regular, open communication and consultation with staff. Person/family engagement: participants endeavoured to provide patient-centred care. Formal patient feedback mechanisms and shared decision-making could be beneficial in the future. Staff engagement: working in a response room could affect well-being, though it also provided networking and learning opportunities. Staff require support and teambuilding. Use of improvement methods: improvements were made in a relatively informal, ad hoc manner. The use of robust methods based on improvement science was not reported. Measurement for quality: data were collected to improve efficiency and accuracy. More rigorous measurement would be beneficial, especially formally collecting stakeholder feedback. Governance for quality: close alignment with collaborators and clear communication with staff are essential. Information and communications technology for quality: this seventh driver was added because the importance of information technology specially designed for pandemics was frequently highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides insights on what worked well and what required improvement in a pandemic response room. It can inform health services, particularly emergency services, in their preparation for additional COVID-19 waves, as well as future crises.

Video analysis of potential concussions in elite male Hurling: are players being assessed according to league guidelines?

BACKGROUND: Hurling is a fast-paced contact sport that places players at risk of concussion. Given the consequences of repeated concussive impacts, it is imperative that concussion management guidelines are followed. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine if potential concussive events (PCEs) in elite Hurling are assessed in accordance with league management guidelines. The secondary objective is to investigate the effectiveness of current concussion training programs. METHODS: Investigators used a video analysis approach to identify PCEs throughout the 2018 and 2019 inter-county Hurling seasons and championships. Subsequent assessment, return to play (RTP) decision, and signs of concussion were evaluated based on previously validated methods. The results were then compared year-over-year with previous research in Gaelic Football (GF). RESULTS: A total of 183 PCEs were identified over 82 matches. PCEs were frequently assessed (86.3%, n = 158) by medical personnel. The majority of assessments were less than 1 min in duration (81.0%, n = 128). Thirteen (7.1%) players were removed following a PCE. There were 43 (23.5%) PCEs that resulted in one or more signs of concussion, of which 10 (23.3%) were removed from play. There was no difference in rate of assessment, duration of assessment, or rate of RTP between 2018 and 2019 in both Hurling and GF, suggesting that current concussion training programs have had limited success. CONCLUSION: In Hurling, players suspected of having sustained a concussion are frequently subject to a brief assessment, and are rarely removed from play. Affirmative action is needed to ensure the consistent application of standardized concussion assessment across the Gaelic Games.

Paediatric major trauma: demographics, management and outcomes at Cork University Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the demographics, injury patterns, management and outcomes of paediatric major trauma patients at Cork University Hospital (CUH). METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study. Data from all CUH paediatric major trauma cases that were recorded in the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database from January 2014 to July 2018 were examined. All patients were under the age of sixteen and fulfilled NOCA's Major Trauma Audit inclusion criteria (Appendix). RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included, with a mean age of 9 years (standard deviation 4.8 years); 33% (n = 54) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. The majority (62%) was male. Paediatric trauma accounts for 6% of TARN eligible cases at CUH. The most common mechanism of injury was falls < 2 m (35%) followed by road trauma (26%). Fifty-one percent were brought by ambulance; 45% self presented. Six percent were transferred out of CUH for definitive care. Limb injuries occurred in 45% of patients (n = 74) and head injury in 29% (n = 47). Head injuries were isolated in 62% (n = 29). Injuries to chest or face were rarely isolated. The mean ISS was 12 (SD 7). The majority of patients (62%) presented out of hours. The median length of stay was 5 days (Interquartile range 3-8 days). Four patients died (mortality rate 2%), all male, two due to head injury and two due to asphyxia by hanging. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric trauma is of low volume, creating challenges in terms of preparedness. The annual number of paediatric major trauma presentations to CUH, including road trauma cases, remains roughly constant.